ISC : Entitlement Owner Review in Sailpoint IdentityNow

Hi,

Trying to create a certification campaign for Entitlement Review with Entitlement Owner as reviewer. Is there a way we can make Entitlement Owner as reviewer of certificate in IdentityNow?

Thanks,

Ankita.

@AnkitaTanwar , not at the moment - but please see this: https://ideas.sailpoint.com/ideas/GOV-I-3566  (spoiler alert: Current status is In Discovery)

You can also check out this discussion: Is there a way to setup Campaign based on Entitlement Owner - SHF Discussion and Questions - SailPoint Developer Community

Not in a direct way.

  1. Select entitlements and select a dummy identity as certifier.
  2. Write a program (java, powershell, python) etc..to make Sailpoint REST API calls
  3. Get the list of entitlements and their owner identity.
  4. Re-assign each item : https://developer.sailpoint.com/docs/api/v2025/move

HI  @AnkitaTanwar  There is at least 1 way to achieve this at the moment:

  1. Create a Search-based Access Item campaign - select all the entitlements required
  2. Make all reviews go to {anyone }- I think it’s easiest if all reviews are set to 1 individual.
  3. Generate and Start the campaign
  4. Write a script using the API to reassign items to the Entitlement Owner.

It is not the prettiest solution, but it is one I have seen customers use in the field.

Possible APIs to use:
https://developer.sailpoint.com/docs/api/v2025/reassign-identity-certifications
https://developer.sailpoint.com/docs/api/v2025/move
https://developer.sailpoint.com/docs/api/v2025/submit-reassign-certs-async

We want to actually turn off reassign for Managers who perform the review.Is there an approval process we can introduce to approve the reassignment process by Cert Admin?

Also you can exlpore Bulk Certification Tool, this might need more efforts on the initial setup but would get easier/quicker in long run if there aren’t too many changes on the entitlement grouping. Though one drawback worth considering is you’ll end up with multiple campigns instead of a single one, as you would get with above approach.

Best,
Vikram